As part of my #intentionsfor2019, I conducted a review of the past 10 years of HPIS Consulting. Yes, HPISC turned 10 in August of 2018, and I was knee deep in PAI activities. So there was no time for celebrations or any kind of reflections until January 2019, when I could realistically evaluate HPISC: vision, mission, and the big strategic stuff. My best reflection exercise had me remembering the moment I created HPIS Consulting in my mind.
Human Performance Improvement (HPI) and Quality Systems
One of the phases for HPI work is a cause analysis for performance discrepancies. The more I learned how the HPI methodology manages this phase the more I remarked on how similar it is to the Deviation /CAPA Quality System requirements. And I found the first touch point between the two methodologies. My formal education background and my current quality systems work finally united. And HPIS Consulting (
In my role of Performance Consultant (PC), I leverage the best techniques and tools from both methodologies. Not just for deviations but for implementing the corrective actions sometimes known as HPI solutions. In this new
Why are so many deviations still occurring? Have our revisions to SOPs and processes brought us farther from a “State of Control”? I don’t believe that is the intention. As a Performance Consultant, I consider deviations and the ensuing investigations rich learning opportunities to find out what’s really going on with our Quality Systems.
At the core of the “HPISC Quality Systems Integration Triangle” is the Change Control system. It is the heartbeat of the Quality Management System providing direction, guidance and establishing the boundaries for our processes. The Internal Auditing System is the health check similar to our annual physicals; the read outs indicate the health of the systems. Deviations/CAPAs are analogous to a pulse check where we check in at the current moment and determine whether we are within acceptable ranges or reaching action levels requiring corrections to bring us back into “a state of control”. And then there is the Training Quality System, which in my opinion is the most cross-functional system of all. It interfaces with all employees; not just the Quality Management System. And so, it functions like food nourishing our systems and fueling sustainability for corrections and new programs.
Whether you are following 21CFR211.192 (Production Record Review) or ICHQ7 Section 2 or 820.100 (Corrective and Preventive Action), thou shall investigate any unexplained discrepancy and a written record of the investigation shall be made that includes the conclusion and the
Remember the PA in C-A-P-A?
Are we so focused on the corrective part and the looming due dates we’ve committed to, that we are losing sight of the preventive actions? Are we rushing through the process to meet imposed time intervals and due dates that we kind of “cross our fingers and hope” that the corrective actions fix the problem without really tracing the impact of the proposed corrective solutions on the other integrated systems? Allison Rossett, author of First Things Fast: a handbook for performance analysis, explains that performance occurs within organizational systems and the ability to achieve, improve and maintain excellent performance, depends on integrated components of other systems that involve people.
Are we likewise convincing ourselves that those fixes should also prevent re-occurrence? Well, that is until a repeat deviation occurs and we’re sitting in another root cause analysis meeting searching for the real root cause. Thomas Gilbert, in his groundbreaking book, Human Competence: engineering worthy performance tells us, that it’s about creating valuable results without using excessive cost. In other words, “worthy performance” happens when the value of business outcomes exceeds the cost of doing the tasks. The ROI of a 3-tiered approach to solving the problem the first
Performance occurs within three tiers
So, donning my Performance Consulting “glasses”, I cross back over to the HPI methodology and open up the HPI solutions toolbox. One of those tools is called a Performance Analysis (PA). This tool points us in the direction of what’s not working for the employee, the job tasks a/or the workplace. The outcome of a performance analysis produces a 3 tiered picture of what’s encouraging or blocking performance for the worker, work tasks, and/or the work environment and what must be done about it at these same three levels.
Root cause analysis (RCA) helps us understand why the issues are occurring and
Thank goodness Training is not the only tool in the HPI toolbox! With corrective actions /HPI solutions designed with input from the 3 tiered PA approach, the focus shifts away from the need to automatically re-train the individual(s), to implementing a solution targeted for workers, the work processes and the workplace environment that will ultimately allow a successful user adoption for the changes/improvements. What a richer learning opportunity than just re-reading the SOP! -VB
- Allison Rossett, First Things Fast: a handbook for Performance Analysis; 2nd edition
- Thomas F. Gilbert, Human Competence: Engineering Worthy Performance